Manipulation with randomized tie-breaking under Maximin

نویسندگان

  • Michael Zuckerman
  • Jeffrey S. Rosenschein
چکیده

In recent papers, Obraztsova et al. initiated the study of the computational complexity of voting manipulation under randomized tie-breaking [3, 2]. The authors provided a polynomial-time algorithm for the problem of finding an optimal vote for the manipulator (a vote maximizing the manipulator’s expected utility) under the Maximin voting rule, for the case where the manipulator’s utilities of the candidates are given by the vector (1, 0, . . . , 0). On the other hand, they showed that this problem is NP-hard for the case where the utilities are (1, . . . , 1, 0). This paper continues that line of research. We prove that when the manipulator’s utilities of the candidates are given by the vector (1, . . . , 1, 0, . . . , 0), with k 1’s and (m− k) 0’s, then the problem of finding an optimal vote for the manipulator is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by k. Also, by exploring the properties of the graph built by the algorithm, we prove that when a certain sub-graph of this graph contains a 2-cycle, then the solution returned by the algorithm is optimal.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the Complexity of Voting Manipulation under Randomized Tie-Breaking

Computational complexity of voting manipulation is one of the most actively studied topics in the area of computational social choice, starting with the groundbreaking work of [Bartholdi et al., 1989]. Most of the existing work in this area, including that of [Bartholdi et al., 1989], implicitly assumes that whenever several candidates receive the top score with respect to the given voting rule...

متن کامل

On manipulation in multi-winner elections based on scoring rules

Multi-winner elections model scenarios where voters must select a fixed-size group of candidates based on their individual preferences. In such scenarios, it is often the case that voters are incentivized to manipulate, i.e. misreport their preferences in order to obtain a better outcome. In this paper, we study the complexity of manipulating multiwinner elections under scoring rules, with a pa...

متن کامل

Ties Matter: Complexity of Voting Manipulation Revisited

In their groundbreaking paper, Bartholdi, Tovey and Trick [1989] argued that many well-known voting rules, such as Plurality, Borda, Copeland and Maximin are easy to manipulate. An important assumption made in that paper is that the manipulator’s goal is to ensure that his preferred candidate is among the candidates with the maximum score, or, equivalently, that ties are broken in favor of the ...

متن کامل

Convergence of iterative voting

In multiagent systems, social choice functions can help aggregate the distinct preferences that agents have over alternatives, enabling them to settle on a single choice. Despite the basic manipulability of all reasonable voting systems, it would still be desirable to find ways to reach a stable result, i.e., a situation where no agent would wish to change its vote. One possibility is an iterat...

متن کامل

Ties Matter: Complexity of Manipulation when Tie-Breaking with a Random Vote

We study the impact on strategic voting of tie-breaking by means of considering the order of tied candidates within a random vote. We compare this to another non-deterministic tie-breaking rule where we simply choose candidate uniformly at random. In general, we demonstrate that there is no connection between the computational complexity of computing a manipulating vote with the two different t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012